On the Shoulders of Giants

Though we are all sort of burning the midnight oil by this time of year, at the end of a jam packed week, I thoroughly enjoyed my Friday today.  I thought I'd share this poetry lesson which has gone well every single time I've done it, in every class, for several years, and with middle school students, that's rare :)  The materials are provided below.

We've been studying poetry, paying lots of attention to rhythm, line breaks, punctuation, mood and figurative language.  Students had written and shared some of their own poetry, but it was time to give them more opportunities to generate their own poetry, and at the ripe date of May 27th with seventh graders, it was time for multiple modalities...

I created six stations at tables.  Each station has directions and materials on it.  At each station, students are required to read the directions, explore the materials, and attempt to write a poem.  The goal is really just to get some lines and ideas from each station.  At the end of the day, they choose their favorite exercise(s) to work into a full length poem or poems.  

The stations are as follows:

Station 1: Picture Poetry 

This station is filled with interesting images.  I have a set of postcards with Keith Haring's work (post card collections are great for this).  I have a set of large prints of Chris Van Allsberg's art, a book of photography, a book with photos of military jets, etc.  Students must choose an image as an inspiration for a poem.

Station 2: Listening Poetry

This station has laptops that are loaded with a folder with 8 instrumental songs from diverse genres and all over the world.  I include jazz, classical, drum & bass, Led Zeppelin, klezmer, hip hop scratching, choir music, Fela Kuti, etc.  Students explore the music, listening with headphones, and choose a piece to use as inspiration for poetry.

Station 3: Objects Poetry

This station has interesting, diverse, and curious objects. Today these included a jar of India ink, a squishy rubber buffalo, a Mexican Day of the Dead miniature diorama, a lock with a key, a worn cloth bracelet, etc. Students must choose an object to observe and explore kinesthetically, then use as the inspiration for a poem.

Station 4: Stole Lines Poetry

This station has a bin full of poetry books.  Students must peruse the books, reading through a few poems.  Then they choose one line from a poem to "steal" and use as the first line to their own poem. The can use the mood of the original as inspiration or not.  (Students used their own judgement about whether to put quotations around the line and cite the poet, depending on the nature of the line. In some cases the lines are so innocuous as not to need it; ie "My father always said.")

Station 5: Letter Poems

In this station students are given an example to read of a poem that is written as a letter.  It begins, "Dear tomorrow..."  They must choose a person, object, animal, or idea to which they will address their own letter poem, and then write their poem.

Station 6: Cinquains

Students had already learned about the American form of poetry invented by Brooklyn poet, Adelaide Crapsey, in 1871, called the Cinquain.  It has five lines and they follow the particular syllabic pattern or 2,4,6,8,2.  Students write cinquains at this station.  I have a box full of possible "first lines" with two syllables, for example, "listen" or "If I" or "gray shark." Students may pick these out of the box if they want.

Students rotate through the stations in their table groups (approximately 4 students per group.)  I have found that about seven minutes is an ideal time to spend at each station.  It is always interesting to see how students respond to different modalities.  All students seem to enjoy the day, and many students who resist writing poetry are finally inspired to experiment with language and their thoughts on the page.  Students who are avid poets, but who get stuck in the same time of writing every time usually get some fresh ideas.  It is also a great lead in to revisions of poems. 

Attached below are the printed materials I used today.  

First, a packet which I printed double sided, and double stapled so it opens like a booklet.  It begins with some general directions for the day and is formatted for them to write everything inside.  If your students have special poetry notebooks to write in, there is no need for something like this.  Also attached are the directions I used for each table, designed by me and my co-teacher (learning specialist) Daniel Brink-Washington. (Note: not presented in the order listed above.)  I put several copies of directions printed on colored paper on each table in transparent binder sleeves.  

Download Poetry stations packet

Download Poetry Stations Directions Sheets

If you try this activity, or already do something like it, please share about it!

 

[image credits~  Keith Haring piece: blogs.hightechhigh.org; headphones: goodhousekeeping.com; inkwell: superstock.com; letters: aldispainters.blogspot.com]

In schools, we spend a lot of time teaching students how to solve their conflicts without violence.  We teach them to use their words when they are upset and to bring their concerns to a teacher or other adult rather than resort to violence.  The adult figure generally sits down with the concerned student and sometimes others involved in the conflict to find solutions. We teach that retaliation is wrong--sometimes the student who "started it" gets a harsher consequence, but anyone involved in violence at school is held accountable for seriously breaking the rules.  We want to educate students to be assertive about their needs and stand up to bullies--but not with violence.  Instead, we want them to find smart, creative, compassionate ways to handle conflict that don't compromise the safety and values of the school community.  

Recently in a Humanities department around curriculum, we were discussing American history. It hit me just how large a role war has played in the development of our country.  The Revolutionary War. The Civil War.  These were moments where the fate of the country was decided based on bloody wars.  When we learn about these wars, we generally don't question the fact that violence was the vehicle for resolving conflict.  

In the mind of a child, how does this contradiction play out? How do kids learn to file away the messages of "Don't solve problems with violence" and "Our country goes to war to defend its interests and values"?

I mention those two wars in particular, because they took place inside our borders, and are clearly examples of us resolving our own conflicts right here with violence.  What about the wars we are waging today in other countries?  How do we explain to children that we are attempting to solve not only our own problems but the problems of other countries with violence?  

The issue becomes all the more perplexing as the news of Osama Bin Laden's death by American military circulates.  Yes, he perpetrated violence on our people--our city.  But it's impossible to ignore that this is a case of retaliation, something we explicitly teach children is wrong.   

What is our message to kids around violence and war? Is there a difference between the two?

 

[image credit: peaceaware.com]

 

 

I was stunned to read this article, The High Cost of Low Teacher Salary by Dave Eggers and Nina Clements Calagari, in the New York Times. It absolutely nails the issue of teacher retention and teacher salary for the general public.  I'm so glad people are taking notice.  

I highly suggest reading the entire piece, which is pretty pithy.  Nonetheless a few highlights:

"We’ve been working with public school teachers for 10 years; every spring, we see many of the best teachers leave the profession. They’re mowed down by the long hours, low pay, the lack of support and respect... So every year 20 percent of teachers in urban districts quit. Nationwide, 46 percent of teachers quit before their fifth year. The turnover costs the United States $7.34 billion yearly. The effect within schools — especially those in urban communities where turnover is highest — is devastating."  

Yes, I see this every year. The idea of "turnaround schools," which is a new buzz word in NYC, holds little promise as far as I can see, because once a school makes a bit of progress, the teachers who have gone way above and beyond the call of duty for little pay and recognition will be leaving. The school will have to start all over again. This simply does not happen in suburban schools, which enjoy better working conditions and salaries for teachers.  Close the achievement gap?  Not like this. 

"People talk about accountability, measurements, tenure, test scores and pay for performance. These questions are worthy of debate, but are secondary to recruiting and training teachers and treating them fairly. There is no silver bullet that will fix every last school in America, but until we solve the problem of teacher turnover, we don’t have a chance."

Agreed. Like this, we make no progress. Thanks for getting straight to the point.

"At the moment, the average teacher’s pay is on par with that of a toll taker or bartender.Teachers make 14 percent less than professionals in other occupations that require similar levels of education. In real terms, teachers’ salaries have declined for 30 years. The average starting salary is $39,000; the average ending salary — after 25 years in the profession — is $67,000. This prices teachers out of home ownership in 32 metropolitan areas, and makes raising a family on one salary near impossible."  

When I tell people I teach middle school students, the most common response is, "God bless you."  It is as if I have chosen a life of charity work, or risked my life joining the army, or something on that level. We do not want our nation's children to be charity work or war zones.  We want them to be well educated by professional teachers. 

"McKinsey polled 900 top-tier American college students and found that 68 percent would consider teaching if salaries started at $65,000 and rose to a minimum of $150,000. Could we do this? If we’re committed to “winning the future,” we should. If any administration is capable of tackling this, it’s the current one. President Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan understand the centrality of teachers and have said that improving our education system begins and ends with great teachers. But world-class education costs money.

For those who say, “How do we pay for this?” — well, how are we paying for three concurrent wars? How did we pay for the interstate highway system? Or the bailout of thesavings and loans in 1989 and that of the investment banks in 2008? How did we pay for the equally ambitious project of sending Americans to the moon? We had the vision and we had the will and we found a way."

Amen. Lots of things cost money.  Education should be a top priority, and educators should be valued not just in empty words, but with professional salaries.

 

[image credit: chaz11.blogspot.com]

 

 

Check out this great post about an "Aha" moment by fellow TLN blogger, Lana Gundy.  (And her previous post on teacher internships here)

This is my first year co-teaching almost the entire school day with in an inclusive classroom (special education and regular education students combined) with minimal pull outs (this is where special education students receive their individualized instruction in a small group).  A large majority of the special education students I teach have been in a self contained classroom in their previous years of education, so I was expecting to have to change my teaching style to accommodate their unique needs.  I also knew that I would have to adjust to co-teaching with another teacher in the same classroom most of the day.  What I wasn’t expecting, however, was to completely transform my teaching of social skills.  

The biggest difference this year is that the students are really struggling to get along with their peers.  After seeing a huge increase in tattling, name calling, and arguing, my co-teacher, Mrs. Merriman, and I started brainstorming ideas to deal with the social problems of our class.  We tried several traditional methods of teaching social skills:

  • Reading books about getting along and acceptance
  • Discussions about how to be respectful and kind
  • Teachable moments about making better choices
  • “What would you do?” scenarios
  • Modeling how to get along
  • Teaching key phrases to say when someone wasn’t being friendly 

And still, there was not much improvement with this group’s ability to get along any better.  Something was missing - and I didn’t realize what it was until this week during a kickball game at recess. 

We’ve been teaching our class how to play kickball at recess.  During the first week, it was still difficult for the students to play nicely together.   So, I started emphasizing that the game was just for fun and I focused on teaching them to play with good sportsmanship.  We taught them to give each other compliments and high-fives when someone made a good play.  We also taught the students to give each other another try if there was a close call.  We also taught them everyone is allowed to play.

The other day, I saw my students do something I hadn’t seen them do all year.   They were playing a game together with out any negative social consequences.  They were respectful, they showed good sportsmanship, and they worked as a team!  They actually had fun together!

It was then when I realized what had been missing. 

We HAD taught our students “all” there was to know about having good social skills, but we forgot to have the students apply the knowledge to their own lives.  And as silly as it may sound, kickball is pretty important in the lives of elementary school students. 

This just goes to show that no matter what you are trying to teach your students or how hard you try, if you don’t give your students the experiences to apply those skills, they’re meaningless.

Lana Gundy teaches fourth grade in a primary school in Peoria, IL.  She is a member of the Universal Leadership Team and is the Gifted Coordinator at her school.  She is also a member of CTQ's Illinois New Millennium Initative, an effort supported by the Center for Teaching Quality to cultivate accomplished, early-career teachers as leaders of practical, effective teaching policy innovations at the state and district levels.

[kickball image: celestevankirk1.blogspot.com]

 

 

On my last post, My Kind of Teaching, on constructivist pedagogy, I received this thoughtful response from a veteran teacher, who chose to remain anonymous. I appreciate it so much, because it offers some validation some of my thinking and intuition regarding the thorniest of issues  when it comes to teaching methodology right now. It seems like in the push to be urgently focused on short-term objectives and obsessive tracking of student learning toward a measurable goal (performance on standardized tests), we miss some of the point--how students actually learn. Often messily.  

Thank you, anonymous teacher, for sharing your thoughts here:

I've been teaching for about 12 years now. When I graduated from TC, my advisor told me one thing that I took with me and that guides me still: If the kids aren't doing something, the kids aren't learning.  He meant that the kids should never just be sitting there listening to me talk, they should instead be working on meaningful tasks used to facilitate learning and later demonstrate what they've learned.  So I always plan like this: What am I doing?What are they doing? The reform movement, unfortunately, has been very bad for progressive teaching because it is all about standardized testing or "accountability."  It is not always easy to control for what a student has learned.  Sometimes students learn something completely different than what I intended.  Sometimes, a student learns what I wanted to teach days after everyone else.  Does that make me a "bad" teacher?  This is a phrase that gets bandied about a lot lately.  Many times I learn from the kids.  It's an interactive process.  Teaching is messy - that's the beauty of it.  The way kids learn is messy.  I also want to point out that alternative certification programs have brought into the teaching field new teachers who are much more traditionalists overall.  I think this is because there is so much emphasis on classroom management.  There's less focus in these programs on philosophical issues of teaching and learning as well as developing rich curriculum because the teachers have to be up and running in just short weeks.  So at TC we had lots of discussions about what the actual role of the teacher was and what the student brought with them into the classroom.  We were encouraged to let the curriculum take care of the classroom management issues. 

Also, make sure to read Alfie Kohn's new article, "Poor Teaching for Poor Children," in which he argues that "it’s possible for the accountability movement to simultaneously narrow the test-score gap and widen the learning gap." Scary, but possibly true. 

[image credit: sophiemazingarbe.com]

 


I'm coming out as a "progressive" educator, a "constructivist" even, who believes in developmentally appropriate curriculum and methods that teach "the Whole Child." Why all the quotation marks? Because these terms have somehow been run into the ground to the point of becoming almost unusable.

Maybe we need new words, maybe we don't, but my beliefs about how kids learn have not changed.  The world changes, kids change, tools change--and teaching changes (or should) to meet all of these shifting forces.  But kids still learn through their experiences.

Humans learn by doing and interacting with people and things over time. John Dewey said this almost one hundred years ago, and in 1916, Lucy Sprague Mitchell and the others who started Bank Street College began putting that vision into practice. They created a new model of teaching and began training teachers to observe and understand the cognitive and social development of children and to lead of the kinds of experiences that would help kids develop into strong, thoughtful members of society. (Read a brief history of Bank Street College of Education here.)

Checking out this 1940's video on Progressive Education (see below) sent to me by my colleague, Nancy Toes, I'm wondering, how much have we really changed? 

Important Note: Though I love the above screen shot from this video, the skills of a "progressive" teacher that successfully facilitates experiential learning are far more than just those mentioned.  

In 2011, children are still commonly lectured and drilled throughout their schooling.  The drills are slightly different.  There are more sophisticated tools now.  The content and the way we present it varies more, but the basic roles of the teacher as chief thinker and the student as follower of instructions remain far too prevalent and fixed in time.  

To my knowledge we have never implemented "learning by doing" with consistency, proper preparation, support and follow-through in public schools.  It is disheartening that today so much money and time is focused on whether students got the right answer on a test. And now we obsess over how many got that right answer? What percentage? How much did they grow since the last test according to the data?  All children are required to learn everything at the same time and demonstrate it in the same way--on the same day.  

Kids don't really grow like that.

The narrator in the 1940 video says, "The happiest moment for the schoolchildren of that sterner era [before progressive education] was when school let out."  For too many students that is still the reality, but it is one that can totally be changed--not with fancier drills, but with meaningful experiences. 

[Images are screen shots from the above video.]

This month I'm very excited to have my TLN colleague, Lana Gundy, sharing some posts here at On the Shoulders of Giants.  She will be one of several teacher bloggers that will be posting at a new group blog called TransformED! Stay tuned!  Following my last post on what's missing from teacher prepartion, Lana discusses what worked in hers...

Three Reasons Why Teacher Internships Work

I nearly fainted when I read the National Council on Teaching Quality “Ed School Essentials:  A Review of Illinois Teacher Preparation”.  My very own Illinois State University’s “review” was not very good.  In fact, it was deplorable: F!   I know from my own experiences, as an ISU grad, the university has an outstanding Professional Development School (PDS program) and the proof is in the internship. 

*Provided a significant amount of time in a classrooms working with students in an urban environment

The PDS program provides essential classroom experiences for interns.   This allows interns practice dealing with situations that arise when working with a group of urban children.  The intern “takes over” the teaching responsibilities in a cooperating teacher’s classroom for thirty-two weeks.  These responsibilities include: lesson planning,  grading papers, behavior management, parent/teacher conferences, staff meetings, board meetings and any other responsibility their cooperating teacher would have.   

*Great Professors and mentors that know how to support and encourage new teachers

The PDS program changed my life and allowed me to do much more than I ever expected to during my first few years of teaching.  What really made a difference for me during the internship was my professor. The instructors are the variables that the NCTQ’s study didn’t account for.  What the instructors bring to the table is invaluable to the student teaching experience.  Not only did my professor teach my group of interns our university courses, but he taught us how to apply what we learned. 

*Opportunities to “team” with other interns

The opportunity to work in a “team” setting allows interns to expand their horizons.  Interns are able to discuss what was happening in our classrooms, which allowed us to learn from each others’ mistakes and successes.  Student teachers work together to improve the culture of the school.   Teams of student teachers can achieve more together, than they can independently.

It is not clear from NCTQ’s study what was evaluated to determine that ISU student teaching program was a failure.  I do know that I was prepared for my first year of urban teaching.  I would not give my experience an F.  In fact, I would recommend that all student teachers be required to complete a thirty-two week internship.  So, if NCTQ’s evaluation of ISU’s program is incorrect, I wonder what other programs were incorrectly evaluated also?

Here is the link to see ISU’s video about the PDS program.  Check out Bill Ferriter’s The Tempered Radical post to read more about NCTQ’s Study.  Also on the subject of alternative student teaching experiences take a look at Dan Brown’s Get in the Fracas post.

 

Lana Gundy teaches fourth grade in a primary school in Peoria, IL.  She is a member of the Universal Leadership Team and is the Gifted Coordinator at her school.  She is also a member of CTQ's Illinois New Millennium Initative, an effort supported by the Center for Teaching Quality to cultivate accomplished, early-career teachers as leaders of practical, effective teaching policy innovations at the state and district levels.

 

This year, I've worked with a group of fellow alumni of Bank Street College of Education on developing ideas for what teacher preparation should look like in the future. We discussed this along with a parallel group of Bank Street faculty members, as well as visiting scholar, Barnett Berry, to build on ideas from the book he and I and 12 other teachers co-authored, Teaching 2030

We pulled together our recollections of what was best about our teacher preparation experience--ie what to keep moving forward--and what was missing.  At Bank Street we had wonderful advisors who led cohorts of teacher candidates make sense of our student teaching experiences, where we got to learn from master teachers.  We also had strong foundations in child development and curriculum building.  These were the essential elements of our teacher preparation experiences. 

There were a few things we felt unprepared to face as we entered teaching. Most notably, we all believed that preparation to work in the specific neighborhoods in which we ended up teaching was very much needed, but we'd had to go about this task ourselves in our own ways.  We agreed that understanding where our students were coming from, their linguistic and cultural backgrounds, and the resources and issues in their neighborhoods is of tremendous value once you're in the classroom. This understanding on the part of the teacher can be the unspoken ingredient that makes the difference between whether or not students trust the teacher and even whether or not the teacher is seen as effective in their early years.  


No part of teacher preparation mentioned above is dispensable. It's just that mentorship, child development, and curriculum are generally understood to be necessary, while understanding student contexts/communities is often not. The image on the left was created in one of our meetings by Bank Street alums Renata Robinson-Glenn, Sam Rosaldo, and Nancy Toes Tangel (with suggestions from the 2030 team) to show the significance and interdependence of these pieces of a students' experience.

Teacher candidates need to be conscious early on about the ways that the teachers must interact directly and indirectly with the communities from which students come.  We thought having alumni share about the contexts in which they teach, how they got to know their students' worlds, and how this informs their teaching would be a good place to start.  In student teaching placements, teacher candidates should be asking questions about this and making observations in the surrounding neighborhood in addition to in school.  

Advisors would make sure that candidates had the opportunity to teach and investigate a variety of contexts during the student teaching.  Then when it was time to apply for jobs, advisors could help teacher candidates make informed decisions about where they wanted to work, including their knowledge of the community in terms of culture, needs and resources, and their knowledge of themselves--what makes me a good match for these students? How long am I planning o stay? What is my level of commitment and how might that affect my students and families' willingness to trust me? These are all questions teachers should consider when deciding on their first job. 

We'd like to see a course, probably taking place the summer before candidates begin in their the first teaching position, devoted to getting to know the school and it's surrounding community--or the various communities from which students come in the case of schools that draw from several neighborhoods.  They would research the neighborhood's history and demographics, find out about community organizations, businesses, and politics.  These experiences would be part of what we call the observation stage of preparing teachers to work with families and communities.  

Ideas on the middle and final stages of preparing teachers for this valuable aspect of our work will be coming in our forthcoming piece on Teacher Preparation 2030.  I will include links and more info. soon.

 

Today I "caught" a student whom I would characterize as a reluctant reader reading the walls of my classroom to another student, who has also struggled a lot with reading this year.  Mind you, they were both supposed to be doing a different assignment at their tables.  While one part of me was about to redirect them both, I realized that this was a great moment I had no interest in interrupting.  They were reading together out of a genuine interest for the information on the walls.  Voluntary reading--the best kind. 

What was on the walls?  Students have been studying the history of the English language and how words get their meanings and how they change across time and place.  It has been fascinating.  One night for homework, I asked them to research their own names.  Where do their names come from?  What do they originally mean? How did they get their names?  What do their names mean to them?

The written responses shared with one another in class were wonderful. They beautifully reflected the diversity of the students and shared something special about each of them.  From a linguistics standpoint, it was illuminating to see the myriad ways that people name arrive at names for their children, where these names come from and what they mean.  These stories echoed the word etymologies students had been studying in class at the same time.  

Finding the two boys reading the walls was a great reminder to me that for every student there is a way to voluntary reading. Sometimes the wall is the perfect medium for repackaging something from class--especially student voices--to reach more students.  Sometimes the timing is just right for reading, and the wall is a way to catch a child on a whim and create flexible opportunities for reading.  Finally, this reminded me that, though it takes time to update classroom bulletin boards, it is so worthwhile.    

That's the title that ISKME founder, Lisa Petrides, and I came up with after much deliberation for my Rapid Fire presentation at the 2010 Big Ideas Fest in December (by far the most challenging public speaking I've ever done).  And now, the video is finally posted for sharing! (Thanks, ISKME!)  

At the moment there is plenty of discussion and question about what exactly a teacherpreneur is.  This video presents a vision of what it could be like for me as a 27 year veteran teacherpreneur in the year 2030.  

Check it out:

 

[image credit: mindshift.kqed.org]